One Lindsay Clancy Juror's 'Reasonable Doubt' Issue

In this conversation, Kelly Stimson, acting director of the Legal Policy Center at the Heritage Foundation, discusses the ongoing Lindsay Clancy trial and the implications of a juror refusing to apply the reasonable doubt standard. Stimson explains the legal procedures the judge might take in such a situation and emphasizes the importance of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The discussion also touches on the potential trial of Nicolás Maduro and the complexities of head of state immunity in international law. Stimson provides insights into the legal system, the burden of proof, and the potential outcomes of high-profile cases.